 |
| 90minsgist 📺 |
VAR drama has once again taken centre stage in English football, as Fulham surprisingly included Josh King’s disallowed goal against Chelsea in their official Goal of the Month vote.
The incident has drawn fresh criticism towards VAR and refereeing standards in the Premier League, with the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) later admitting the goal should have stood.
---
⚽ The Incident
During the heated clash between Fulham and Chelsea, Josh King found the net with a superb finish that sent Fulham fans into wild celebrations. However, the joy was short-lived as VAR intervened, and the goal was controversially ruled out.
Despite the disallowance, Fulham later included the strike in their monthly goal competition, sparking debate across social media. Many fans interpreted it as a tongue-in-cheek statement by the club, indirectly highlighting frustration with refereeing decisions. 🗣️😅
---
📝 PGMOL’s Apology
After reviewing the footage, PGMOL released a statement admitting that the VAR decision had been wrong. Officials confirmed that the goal should have counted, acknowledging the error and offering an apology to Fulham and their supporters.
This is not the first time PGMOL has had to apologise this season. A growing number of mistakes involving VAR reviews have raised concerns about the system’s consistency and its impact on the integrity of the competition.
---
🔥 Fans’ Reaction
Football fans were quick to react online, with many using Fulham’s Goal of the Month inclusion as a chance to mock VAR. Supporters argued that the fact a disallowed goal could still be celebrated as one of the club’s best finishes only proves how out-of-touch officiating has become.
Chelsea fans, meanwhile, expressed relief that the decision went in their favour on the day, but many neutrals admitted the call had been harsh on Fulham.
---
🌍 Wider VAR Debate
This latest episode reignites the wider debate on VAR’s role in football. While the technology was introduced to reduce errors and increase fairness, incidents like Josh King’s disallowed strike highlight how subjective interpretations can still influence outcomes.
Critics argue that referees are becoming too reliant on the system, while others believe clearer rules and better training are needed to ensure consistency.
---
🎯 Conclusion
Josh King’s goal against Chelsea may not have counted on the scoreboard, but it has made headlines for all the wrong reasons. By including it in their Goal of the Month vote, Fulham cleverly turned a moment of controversy into a statement against refereeing errors.
With PGMOL admitting fault yet again, the pressure is on the Premier League to deliver greater accountability and transparency in VAR decisions moving forward.
---
✍️ Subscribe and follow up for more.
📲 Join our Telegram channel 👉 t.me/Oddsby90minsgist
🌍 Publis
hed for readers in Canada, UK, USA, Nigeria & worldwide.
0 Comments