 |
| 90mingist 📺 |
After being hit with 74 charges by the FA relating to financial regulations, agents, and third-party investments, Chelsea Football Club has moved quickly to issue a firm and transparent response.
The charges, which cover the period between 2009 and 2022 under Roman Abramovich’s ownership, sparked huge debate across the football world. But Chelsea insist there has been zero sporting advantage gained and are confident that no sporting sanction will be required.
---
🏛️ Chelsea’s Official Statement
In an official statement released by the club, Chelsea confirmed that the matters were self-reported immediately after the new ownership group completed its takeover in May 2022.
💬 The statement reads:
“Chelsea is pleased to confirm that its engagement with The FA concerning matters that were self-reported by the club is now reaching a conclusion. During due diligence, the ownership group became aware of potentially incomplete financial reporting concerning historical transactions and other potential breaches of FA rules. Immediately upon the completion of the purchase, the Club self-reported these matters to all relevant regulators, including The FA.”
The club emphasized that they have shown “unprecedented transparency”, offering the FA comprehensive access to all files and data, and will continue to work collaboratively to bring the matter to a swift close.
 |
| Todd Boehly📸 |
📊 The Core of the Case
The 74 FA charges are linked to three main areas of regulation:
FA Football Agents Regulations (J1 and C2)
FA Intermediaries Regulations (A2 and A3)
FA Third-Party Investment Regulations (A1 and B3)
Most of the alleged breaches date back to 2010–2016, a period when Chelsea was highly competitive in both domestic and European football.
However, Chelsea stress that these issues are administrative and financial in nature — not sporting manipulations. The club believes this distinction is vital in arguing against any punishment that would affect current competition standings.
---
🔍 Why Chelsea Hired Accountants
To further demonstrate good faith, Chelsea have engaged one of the world’s leading accountancy firms to scrutinize the FA’s allegations. This independent analysis is meant to prove the club’s claim that:
There was no competitive advantage gained.
All issues were linked to historical reporting.
Today’s Chelsea, under Boehly-Clearlake ownership, operates under full compliance.
This move highlights the club’s strategy: by showing transparency and professionalism, Chelsea aim to avoid sporting sanctions such as points deductions.
---
⚖️ What Happens Next?
The FA’s independent panel will now review Chelsea’s defense. Potential outcomes include:
Financial fines for incomplete historical records 💷
Official warnings for governance issues
No action if Chelsea’s cooperation satisfies regulators
Or, in a worst-case scenario, points deductions — something Chelsea insist would be unfair
Given that the new owners self-reported the matter and provided full cooperation, many analysts expect the FA to opt for fines rather than competitive punishments.
---
🔵 A Club in Transition
This case symbolizes a shift in Chelsea’s culture. The club is eager to separate the Abramovich era from its current management. Since May 2022, the Boehly-Clearlake group has stressed compliance, transparency, and long-term sustainability.
Fans may feel uneasy about the headlines, but Chelsea’s handling of the situation reflects a determination to move forward as a modern, responsible football club.
---
👉 The spotlight now shifts to the FA’s next move. Will Chelsea’s proactive transparency protect them from sporting sanctions? Or will English football see another major disciplinary ruling?
📲 Stay connected with 90minsgist 📺 for instant updates on this developing case.
🔗 Join our Telegram for daily football u
pdates: t.me/Oddsby90minsgist
✍️ Subscribe and follow up for more breaking stories!
0 Comments